• By Tony Harriman •
Life sometimes has more irony than we can deal with, or for which we have a word.
Right now a couple of guys sub-contracted by Sears are installing a dishwasher in our kitchen. This will be the third dishwasher we've enjoyed from Sears; one we had for fifteen years, the other for two weeks. The second one died after four days on the job and is being replaced by this third machine.
Because we had such a trouble-free experience with the first Kenmore (Sears brand) dishwasher, we felt it would be a safe bet to replace the old Kenmore with a new one. The ironic part of this short story is, of course, that the new machine didn't even reach its first birthday. We'll see how the replacement fares.
Some of the irony of life can be found in brief witticisms, such as: "The more birthdays you have, the longer you live," or "It's only my craziness that keeps me sane."
Some of life's irony can take a very dark turn, such as: "We go to war so that we can live in peace." That statement is one of the saddest testimonies the human family has to offer. Estimates (from the people who study such things) are that more money is spent on producing materials that kill than is spent on helping keep people alive. The money spent on just the technology used to keep tabs on our international enemies could feed the entire globe for a year, with twelve baskets left over.
It's ironic that religion, which is supposed to draw us all closer to God, serves more often only to separate us from each other — THAT just doesn't add up for me.
Irony scuppers an "unsinkable" Titanic on its maiden voyage, before any real rust has a chance to set in, and before the rats are given any opportunity to set up home. Some of the crockery and silverware had never been used. Now, THAT is surely the epitome of irony.
There is a strange Biblical principle that gets a mention in the Book of Proverbs; in the old King James Version it reads like this: "There is that scattereth, and yet increaseth; and there is that withholdeth more than is meet, yet tendeth to poverty." (Proverbs 11:24). The idea that plays out is so expected on an everyday scale that we don't view it as irony. We take a single potato, cut it up and bury it; what happens is so regular, yet so unreasonable. That single potato brings forth other plants which themselves bear many more potatoes. An ear of corn has the potential for producing hundreds more ears just like itself. All that's required with these and countless other examples is that we be willing to scatter what the plants give us so that they may be allowed to increase. But notice that there is a flip side to the principle; If we keep back everything that the plants produce, and don't take the risk of casting some seed back into the soil, we end up with nothing, even though it looked like we were being so judicious with our economy.
Picture these statements, and read them with a view to irony:
• We are committed to setting the inmates free.
• Your determination to keep the Concentration Camps open is distracting.
• The day after winning the multi-million dollar lottery, the winner, as he crossed the road to the bank, was accidentally struck and killed by a vehicle owned by an employee of the lottery organization.
• In an attempt to better his health, Mr. Smith adopted a vegetarian diet, only to discover, too late, that he was allergic to nuts, soy and wheat. Smith choked to death as his throat constricted after eating a lunch which included peanut butter on wheat toast and a glass of soy milk.
If Murphy had a cousin, surely his name would be Irony. Murphy's Law says if it CAN go wrong it WILL go wrong; Irony makes it go wrong in the WORST possible way. There's an expression which says if something has a 50-50 chance of going wrong, 90 percent of the time it will. Think about that the next time you go to plug the charger into your mobile phone; most connectors fit only one of two ways, but notice how often you get it wrong.
I'm not sure if we could call it irony that the red blood of Jesus will make the wrongdoer's sins as white as snow, but it's certainly right up there with paradoxes, wouldn't you say? The paradox of death giving life is, in my opinion, a theme that will get much attention from glorified human beings on the other side of the veil, especially when you consider the unworthiness of the subjects.
Some paradoxes are man-made, such as our description of light; we call it a particle and a wave. How can it be both; surely that's a contradiction? Well, light is what it is. If our description of it is paradoxical, then so be it. A better use of the word "paradox" might be as a description for a jumbo shrimp. You do the math.
Some paradoxes are better known than others, such as: "Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind," or "This is the beginning of the end," and "You must speculate if you wish to accumulate."
As a spectator of American opinions I have watched with interest the continual defense of the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights. With equal interest I have listened to recordings of speeches by Martin Luther King Jr., and his discourses regarding inequality in America which came to a head in the 1960s. His argument for equality was based on one of the founding pillars of the United States of America, which asserts that all men are created equal. Of course, once a reasonable person allows the mind to grasp the logic, it's just a matter of time before things change in society. And that's exactly what has happened. America, in my opinion, has a long way to go, but at least the tracks are tending in the right direction.
Let's take the reasoning a little further. Suppose we COULD make just a tiny tweak to the Foundation. Would we not agree that all men AND WOMEN are created of equal value? Could we not agree that the Declaration of Independence was framed by men during a time when patriarchal tendencies reigned? Would we not agree that attitudes and expectations have changed since the mid-eighteenth century, and that often the sole breadwinner for the home is the mother? The reality is that the mother is often the only parent anywhere in the picture.
I suppose you could say it's ironic that the change that SHOULD be made is the change that CANNOT be made, because to change one single thought in the Pillars is to leave the rest open to further interpretation. I imagine we would be surprised at how strong that thought-process is in the considerations of church doctrine — ANY church doctrine. Consider how fragile must be the rope holding up the idea that all the Commandments were nailed to the cross of Jesus. ALL the Commandments? Well … maybe not all … maybe just that one. Which one? The one that forbids stealing? The one that denies us the right to infidelity? No, just the one that God said to remember — the fourth one, relating to the seventh-day Sabbath rest, forget about that one. What kind of reasoning is that? It's the kind of reasoning that causes trouble to the human family the world over, double standards that make one thing right for you and another right for me. What's good for the goose is not necessarily good for the gander.
Part of the human problem lies with our tendency to get comfortable, to settle in to what anchors we want to use for our lives. In my short Christian walk on the planet I have spent time around people who hold differing opinions on what it means to serve and worship God. Something that jumps right off the page for me is how we each have a relatively small handful of Bible verses that we find meaningful and which control the rudder of our spiritual boat. If you spend enough time listening to people, you quickly realize that the Bible for most of us is a very small Book with only a few ideas that are worded in many different ways. The fact that we find ourselves rehearsing the same verses over and over seems to me to be a testimony to how unable we are to grow larger than our fishbowl will allow. In order to make a change in our spiritual thinking, we need to have a reason to change, and most of us have little time to fathom what we already know and believe, since a lot of our time is spent repeating and rehearsing familiar verses in the hope of better understanding those few verses — now THAT's ironic.
And that's just my take on it ….
What's It All About?
Trying to find a handle on the world in which we live. Feel free to pass this on.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Monday, April 22, 2013
"The Ultimate Communicator"
• By Tony Harriman •
Those of you who know a little about communication skills will be aware that there are effective ways of getting a point across that leave no room for doubt in the mind of the hearer. An argument can be so constructed that the natural, logical conclusion is for the honest hearer to agree with the assertion. If we lived in a perfect world, this kind of verbal communication tool would be extremely useful, since no one would use it for evil. But we don't live in a perfect world, and are often left at the mercy of our own discernment … and ignorance.
Convincing rhetoric was originally mastered by those in ancient Greek courts, but today is practiced and applied by much broader groups of people: lawyers, politicians, preachers, and advertisers on every inhabited continent. If it adds up, we buy into it — usually. But we don't always do the smart thing. Buying this or that product might make sense, but we can't always afford to buy a car that will offer trouble-free service for ten or fifteen years, so we settle for something cheaper, something we can afford to fix as necessary. Thirty-year roof shingles obviously last longer, but twenty-year shingles cost less. You know how it goes.
Convincing the masses is the main object of those who rule, or who wish to rule. Those desiring to be in charge generally find ways to get into the heads of their potential subjects and plant seeds consistent with their ideology. In some parts of the world, prospective leaders, unable to convince with logic, often resort to terrifying with fear, ie: North Korea, Nazi Germany, or any of the European nations during the Dark Ages.
Let's dive right into this interesting observation: the Author and Creator of everything that exists is well aware that human beings can be influenced by words, yet He chooses to remain silent when it would be a simple thing for Him to convince us of the right way to go about things. But He hasn't always been silent. There was a time when Jesus, the Son of God, walked a small corner of the planet and shared with a favored generation that the Kingdom of Heaven was "Like unto … ," and if we wanted to be wise and build our home on the rock, all we would have to do is listen to and apply His words to our lives. That seems simple enough, doesn't it? We don't need a degree in physics, or oceanology, or ecology to help us walk in the light of Heaven, even though I personally believe that knowing something about those fields can lead us to a deeper appreciation of the things God has made and the plans he has for us.
Let's back up a little. God is a Being who speaks worlds into existence out of nothing. If He wants to make a sun with nine planets (or eight, if you don't care much for Pluto), it is a simple thing for Him to get the math right first time. If He wants to compose water molecules, he gets it spot on at the first shot. "Oops!" is not a word in the dictionary of Heaven.
If God wanted to convince you and me about the realities of the unseen world, he could use words, rhetoric and structure that would leave us in no doubt as to what was what. He knows us, and knows how to reach us. There is nothing mysterious to God about the human mind and heart. Had there been any partition in the human mind which could not be fathomed by God, surely the gap was bridged when the Son of God took on our humanity. Perhaps God remains as silent as He does because to do otherwise would give Him an unfair advantage over us. Maybe this is often why He doesn't tell us which color car to buy, or which brand of toothpaste would be better.
We get a look behind the scenes of persuasive skills when we consider the Romans who returned from listening to Jesus and gave the report, "Never man spake like this." The Middle East has seen culture come and go; they have been ruled by Greek, Roman and more. Before the Caesars, Rome had a reasonable court of law in place, where the educated convinced the educated with sound argument. Hebrew doctors of the Mosaic Law, using some of these tools of reasoning, were well able to convince their hearers of the validity of their claims. But when they came in contact with Jesus, all they did was trip over themselves trying to prove that they were correct, because often their logic simply didn't make sense. It wasn't necessary for Jesus to spend a whole lot of time pointing out erroneous ideas; when He told the people what was truth, there was a reasonable, logical soundness in His assertions that convinced the hearers of unseen realities.
I imagine Jesus had to be careful regarding His use of spoken language, lest an unwilling heart should follow His bidding based on argument and reason alone. Convincing the head is not the same as convincing the heart. An unwilling heart may follow the rules based on a desire to live, rather than a desire to do the right thing. Whatever the term "holistic" means to you, God appears to be interested in the whole person, not just the part of us clinging to the idea of self preservation.
Consider the speech Jesus used when trying to enlighten the people. He referred often to the Old Testament writers, and even spoke of current events as being fulfillments of prophecy in His day. But don't miss this — Jesus taught His hearers about the Kingdom of Heaven by using parables, and His illustrations were taken from the Book of Nature. The lessons seem so simple, when we look back on the Bible record. Teachers had been using parables as a teaching tool for centuries, so this was not a new thing. What's interesting to me, though, is that Jesus should use created things to teach us about things we cannot see or handle. And in order for Jesus to get the illustration right, He must have had an accurate account of the original idea. The Bible teaches that Jesus, in a Godly form before the Creation, made everything that exists, so teaching others about His creation would not have been difficult … had His hearers possessed ears to hear and eyes to see. The proud and self-assertive had no need for this peasant from Nazareth to teach them anything, so probably walked away scratching their heads.
Metaphors, similes, illustrations and parables leave room for darkened minds to misunderstand. Yet Jesus chose continually to plant pictures using this method. It seems more important that the "idea" of the Kingdom should be grasped rather than having a description of the materials used to compose the place or the clothes worn there.
The experts tell us that the oldest language on the planet still in use today is Hebrew. Going through very few changes since the oldest written form of it was found to be from around 1,000 years BC, Hebrew is spoken today throughout Israel, having been revived in the 19th century and re-introduced in Israel as a spoken and literary language. It had been continually used in Jewish liturgy and rabbinical literature, but is today part of modern speech. Imagine a re-introduction of Shakespearean discourse and you'll have an idea of what happened in the Middle East a couple of hundred years ago.
No matter how we look at language on the planet, whether spoken, written or drawn, we have to accept the fact that changes have taken place in the way human beings communicate with each other. The English language, for instance, appears to have undergone its most significant changes when it adopted German words which were brought into the country by Saxon rulers. When the Saxons gave the throne to the Normans, well, we simply added French words to the dictionary (although there really was no dictionary as we know it today). When the French left the country, what remained was a mix of German and French which evolved into Middle English. Many dialects of English are today still spoken across England, and occasional confusion results from using old words or expressions unfamiliar to all English people throughout the country.
Now consider the task Jesus embarked upon to make known the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven. He used the modern vernacular, everyday language, to paint pictures using illustrations from a book which has undergone no changes in spelling, meaning or mathematical summation: The Book of Nature. The natural world was here before human beings. Our first introduction to life was conveyed through an observation of the world around us. One of the first jobs on the planet was naming the animals. Even though the natural world has suffered under a barrage of sin and exploitation, yet the math that makes it all work is still very much intact. The Laws of Physics are well established.
Jesus drew heavily from the lessons illustrated by the works of His own hands, perhaps knowing that this book would never change its story. An interesting observation regarding the natural world is of how alike things are globally. What I mean by that is that a sparrow is a sparrow is a sparrow, no matter where on the face of the earth it may live. A sparrow speaks the language of the sparrow. It's only man who appears to be installed with language software that is continually requiring an upgrade. In the natural world, there may be slightly different species of plant and animal which sound or look or smell a little different from each other, but that's because they ARE different from each other. That plant is a "variety" of rose; that bird is a "species" of seagull; not all woodpeckers are the same, and they don't all speak the same language; but if they ARE of the same kind then they DO make the same sound. No matter how you look at it, the Book of Nature is the oldest book on the planet. No, the Book of Nature is the oldest book in the universe, so is it any wonder that Jesus used an original -- and first -- translation of the Kingdom of Heaven.
When God speaks, things happen. He utters, and worlds come into being, teeming with life. Jesus says, "Be healed," and they are healed. The words are spoken, "Lazarus, come forth," and Lazarus lives again. As simple as it would be for God to "cause" thinking beings to do things "His" way, He chooses not to subject us to the same rules He applies to the vegetation. But that doesn't mean we can't learn lessons from the abundance of non-thinking life all around us. Something is being told to us regarding the character and person of the Artist whose works we so clearly see and hear; the lessons are being told BY THOSE WORKS. And if it was good enough for Jesus, the Ultimate Communicator, to use lowly things, such as seeds and ants and lilies, to teach us things that will make us better people, then who are we to think we should disregard these lessons.
And that's just my take on it ….
Those of you who know a little about communication skills will be aware that there are effective ways of getting a point across that leave no room for doubt in the mind of the hearer. An argument can be so constructed that the natural, logical conclusion is for the honest hearer to agree with the assertion. If we lived in a perfect world, this kind of verbal communication tool would be extremely useful, since no one would use it for evil. But we don't live in a perfect world, and are often left at the mercy of our own discernment … and ignorance.
Convincing rhetoric was originally mastered by those in ancient Greek courts, but today is practiced and applied by much broader groups of people: lawyers, politicians, preachers, and advertisers on every inhabited continent. If it adds up, we buy into it — usually. But we don't always do the smart thing. Buying this or that product might make sense, but we can't always afford to buy a car that will offer trouble-free service for ten or fifteen years, so we settle for something cheaper, something we can afford to fix as necessary. Thirty-year roof shingles obviously last longer, but twenty-year shingles cost less. You know how it goes.
Convincing the masses is the main object of those who rule, or who wish to rule. Those desiring to be in charge generally find ways to get into the heads of their potential subjects and plant seeds consistent with their ideology. In some parts of the world, prospective leaders, unable to convince with logic, often resort to terrifying with fear, ie: North Korea, Nazi Germany, or any of the European nations during the Dark Ages.
Let's dive right into this interesting observation: the Author and Creator of everything that exists is well aware that human beings can be influenced by words, yet He chooses to remain silent when it would be a simple thing for Him to convince us of the right way to go about things. But He hasn't always been silent. There was a time when Jesus, the Son of God, walked a small corner of the planet and shared with a favored generation that the Kingdom of Heaven was "Like unto … ," and if we wanted to be wise and build our home on the rock, all we would have to do is listen to and apply His words to our lives. That seems simple enough, doesn't it? We don't need a degree in physics, or oceanology, or ecology to help us walk in the light of Heaven, even though I personally believe that knowing something about those fields can lead us to a deeper appreciation of the things God has made and the plans he has for us.
Let's back up a little. God is a Being who speaks worlds into existence out of nothing. If He wants to make a sun with nine planets (or eight, if you don't care much for Pluto), it is a simple thing for Him to get the math right first time. If He wants to compose water molecules, he gets it spot on at the first shot. "Oops!" is not a word in the dictionary of Heaven.
If God wanted to convince you and me about the realities of the unseen world, he could use words, rhetoric and structure that would leave us in no doubt as to what was what. He knows us, and knows how to reach us. There is nothing mysterious to God about the human mind and heart. Had there been any partition in the human mind which could not be fathomed by God, surely the gap was bridged when the Son of God took on our humanity. Perhaps God remains as silent as He does because to do otherwise would give Him an unfair advantage over us. Maybe this is often why He doesn't tell us which color car to buy, or which brand of toothpaste would be better.
We get a look behind the scenes of persuasive skills when we consider the Romans who returned from listening to Jesus and gave the report, "Never man spake like this." The Middle East has seen culture come and go; they have been ruled by Greek, Roman and more. Before the Caesars, Rome had a reasonable court of law in place, where the educated convinced the educated with sound argument. Hebrew doctors of the Mosaic Law, using some of these tools of reasoning, were well able to convince their hearers of the validity of their claims. But when they came in contact with Jesus, all they did was trip over themselves trying to prove that they were correct, because often their logic simply didn't make sense. It wasn't necessary for Jesus to spend a whole lot of time pointing out erroneous ideas; when He told the people what was truth, there was a reasonable, logical soundness in His assertions that convinced the hearers of unseen realities.
I imagine Jesus had to be careful regarding His use of spoken language, lest an unwilling heart should follow His bidding based on argument and reason alone. Convincing the head is not the same as convincing the heart. An unwilling heart may follow the rules based on a desire to live, rather than a desire to do the right thing. Whatever the term "holistic" means to you, God appears to be interested in the whole person, not just the part of us clinging to the idea of self preservation.
Consider the speech Jesus used when trying to enlighten the people. He referred often to the Old Testament writers, and even spoke of current events as being fulfillments of prophecy in His day. But don't miss this — Jesus taught His hearers about the Kingdom of Heaven by using parables, and His illustrations were taken from the Book of Nature. The lessons seem so simple, when we look back on the Bible record. Teachers had been using parables as a teaching tool for centuries, so this was not a new thing. What's interesting to me, though, is that Jesus should use created things to teach us about things we cannot see or handle. And in order for Jesus to get the illustration right, He must have had an accurate account of the original idea. The Bible teaches that Jesus, in a Godly form before the Creation, made everything that exists, so teaching others about His creation would not have been difficult … had His hearers possessed ears to hear and eyes to see. The proud and self-assertive had no need for this peasant from Nazareth to teach them anything, so probably walked away scratching their heads.
Metaphors, similes, illustrations and parables leave room for darkened minds to misunderstand. Yet Jesus chose continually to plant pictures using this method. It seems more important that the "idea" of the Kingdom should be grasped rather than having a description of the materials used to compose the place or the clothes worn there.
The experts tell us that the oldest language on the planet still in use today is Hebrew. Going through very few changes since the oldest written form of it was found to be from around 1,000 years BC, Hebrew is spoken today throughout Israel, having been revived in the 19th century and re-introduced in Israel as a spoken and literary language. It had been continually used in Jewish liturgy and rabbinical literature, but is today part of modern speech. Imagine a re-introduction of Shakespearean discourse and you'll have an idea of what happened in the Middle East a couple of hundred years ago.
No matter how we look at language on the planet, whether spoken, written or drawn, we have to accept the fact that changes have taken place in the way human beings communicate with each other. The English language, for instance, appears to have undergone its most significant changes when it adopted German words which were brought into the country by Saxon rulers. When the Saxons gave the throne to the Normans, well, we simply added French words to the dictionary (although there really was no dictionary as we know it today). When the French left the country, what remained was a mix of German and French which evolved into Middle English. Many dialects of English are today still spoken across England, and occasional confusion results from using old words or expressions unfamiliar to all English people throughout the country.
Now consider the task Jesus embarked upon to make known the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven. He used the modern vernacular, everyday language, to paint pictures using illustrations from a book which has undergone no changes in spelling, meaning or mathematical summation: The Book of Nature. The natural world was here before human beings. Our first introduction to life was conveyed through an observation of the world around us. One of the first jobs on the planet was naming the animals. Even though the natural world has suffered under a barrage of sin and exploitation, yet the math that makes it all work is still very much intact. The Laws of Physics are well established.
Jesus drew heavily from the lessons illustrated by the works of His own hands, perhaps knowing that this book would never change its story. An interesting observation regarding the natural world is of how alike things are globally. What I mean by that is that a sparrow is a sparrow is a sparrow, no matter where on the face of the earth it may live. A sparrow speaks the language of the sparrow. It's only man who appears to be installed with language software that is continually requiring an upgrade. In the natural world, there may be slightly different species of plant and animal which sound or look or smell a little different from each other, but that's because they ARE different from each other. That plant is a "variety" of rose; that bird is a "species" of seagull; not all woodpeckers are the same, and they don't all speak the same language; but if they ARE of the same kind then they DO make the same sound. No matter how you look at it, the Book of Nature is the oldest book on the planet. No, the Book of Nature is the oldest book in the universe, so is it any wonder that Jesus used an original -- and first -- translation of the Kingdom of Heaven.
When God speaks, things happen. He utters, and worlds come into being, teeming with life. Jesus says, "Be healed," and they are healed. The words are spoken, "Lazarus, come forth," and Lazarus lives again. As simple as it would be for God to "cause" thinking beings to do things "His" way, He chooses not to subject us to the same rules He applies to the vegetation. But that doesn't mean we can't learn lessons from the abundance of non-thinking life all around us. Something is being told to us regarding the character and person of the Artist whose works we so clearly see and hear; the lessons are being told BY THOSE WORKS. And if it was good enough for Jesus, the Ultimate Communicator, to use lowly things, such as seeds and ants and lilies, to teach us things that will make us better people, then who are we to think we should disregard these lessons.
And that's just my take on it ….
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










